@naturecel I struggled with dark eye circles for a while whilst on the diet (due to my skeletal structure) recently they’ve gotten better, just focus on getting some sun and make sure your getting some collagen (bone broths, cartilage) and they should clear up the most they can

@primalking67 like other people are saying, you should eat as much as your body needs but also make sure to have lots of dairy and fats for good development

@Swansven yes coconut oil is pretty good, having a hot bath with about a tablespoon of coconut oil will make you smell like it - therefore hiding the sweat smell. but also just applying coconut oil to your armpits will help too

@Rabbi pretty sure aajonus said it is only needed for people who have been malnourished. He said if you grew up on a completely raw primal diet then there is never need for vegetable juice or any other or his recipes for healing, such as his nut formula.

I get what you mean about all of this especially the milk with meat part I highly advice drinking milk 1 hr after eating meat, but, why the Salt? There's literly no studies saying salt is bad?

@veloman thanks for the tip

@Jack okay will do

Ah ok. Thanks

Idk I think resident raw shops there

@ENAMV beautiful

@zygomidus yea i noticed when i eat my meat right out of the fridge it tastes horrible. Same with eggs. I always try to leave it out for 1h before eating it

When faceiq brutally destroyed him and his religion, his brain went ka-bloop, which unleashed his soylent fueled temper tantrums. Nah fr he wanted to do a professional MMA fight over an avocado

Aajonus eyes looked really good in the video where he said cream is the only fat that will completely nutrify the nervous system or something like that

Let's go!!! Your body is adapted to natural foods. Your body is smart and won't digest the food particles with toxins on them cause the body will recognize it as food (the raw milk in this case) only if it's raw. Drinking grain fed milk is very good, just not perfect. So you'll be fine. I would recommend to wait until its room temp, then lot it rest at room temp for a couple of hours and then drink it so the enzymes and everything becomes active. If your still growing then you should drink I'd say minimum 2L/day. Btw I just found a giga Chad farmer that sells me more raw milk despite the laws in sweden.

@Mishutka_47 yea, so for context, our mitochondria needs electrons to work and these electrons can leak because of oxidative stress or a few other things. Grounding is basically free electrons from the earth. This can improve your metabolism because it combats oxidative stress. This is one of many mechanisms by which grounding helps your body. It's very evident that humans were very often grounded and are meant to be so.

@Jack I didn't think about that, pretty cool how many issues raw solves

@Jack I had this knee click for years (not painful or anything) and it fixed in like 2 weeks of just thinking about my gait. Pretty interesting how things align themselves when you align yourself with nature.

@Swansven There is definetely some small visible improvements in density, length seems similar though. I think the first after picture best shows the density increase in the eyelashes. Its not the half an inch or whatever that you thought, but definetely improvement nontheless. Good work!

@Elina @Elina said in Your Opportunity to Strengthen RawPrimal Evidence: @admin Why not using studies ? Because studies are not science. Definition of science: Science is the practice of forming claims about the natural world that are empirically grounded, rigorously testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. Empirical: grounded in careful, objective observation of the real world, with clear measurement methods. Rigorously testable: the claim can be examined through well-defined, repeatable procedures that control for bias and confounding factors. Reproducible: independent researchers, using the same methods, can replicate the study and arrive at consistent results. Falsifiable: there exists a conceivable observation or experiment that could definitively show the claim is false. If any of those fail, it’s not science. Where most studies break is that they are not rigorously testable. Observational studies can’t fully isolate variables. Lifestyle, genetics, socioeconomic factors, all confound results. On the other hand when we use biochemistry especially in human physiology. We can generate information that is highly scientific. Biochemistry is excellent as it stays on the highly objective chemistry and then derives only the as closely as possible objective theories from biology that are closely linked to chemistry and filters the more fringe biological theories that are not derived using chemistry. Biochemistry is truly as close we can get to real science which is empirical, rigorously testable, reproducible and falsifiable. Example how a study fails (Fruit and vegetable consumption reduce risk of death): https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/fruit-vegetable-consumption-reduce-risk-death?utm_source=chatgpt.com Empirical: YES The researchers collected real data from large groups of people over many years and measured what they ate and who died. Rigorously testable: NO They didn’t control people’s diets. Other factors like exercise, genetics, and lifestyle also affect health, so the effect of fruits and vegetables alone can’t be fully tested in isolation. Falsifiable: NO The study can’t definitively prove or disprove that eating more fruits and vegetables causes longer life. Exactly reproducible: NO People self-report what they eat, which can be inaccurate, and small changes in how the study is done can change the results. Conclusion: one the most popular studies about vegetables linked to health gets proven as unscientific. Correlation doesn't mean causation. Truly scientific study is impossible for human behavioral nutrition Every human would need to be identical (genetically, epigenetically, microbiomally, objectively etc.) from the start -> Impossible. Even identical twins diverge over time due to tiny environmental differences. Exact same behaviors/lifestyle in every way (exercise, stress, sleep, pollution exposure, social life, etc.) → Impossible. Humans live very unique lives. Perfect compliance with the exact diet (same veggies, same amounts, same preparation, no cheating, no substitutions) for decades → Pretty much impossible long-term. People get bored, get sick, change preferences, or just forget. Start from birth and follow to natural death → Basically impossible. The only way to capture full lifetime effects. These tiny and big natural human differences amplify over decades, influencing how each person responds to the same diet or lifestyle. No matter how controlled a study is, participants are biologically and lifestyle wise unique in ways we can’t fully account for.

@Swansven 100%