Steak high and low quality

[Brody Moore]

If a steak if from a high quality source eat it raw. A low quality steak (grain fed) cook the meat!

[PrimalFinngolian]

@Brody-Moore What the fuck are you even saying

[zygomidus]

no, eat both raw.

[legendarykennen]

Your making the toxic byproducts in the low quality meat worse by cooking it lmfao, i can tell you just watched faceiq's video

[aiden]

@Brody-Moore faceiq parrot

[Hunterskull]

@Brody-Moore
Low quality raw steak is better than high quality cooked/frozen steak.

[88]

@Brody-Moore This is backwards logic. According to aajonus, it's would be more optimal to cook high quality meat and eat low quality meat raw. (not saying that he advocated for cooking at all). Because if you eat something raw, you absorb only about 3-5% of the toxins compared to cooked which is ~100%

[Duta M]

@legendarykennen Doesn't cooking destroy the toxins present in meat?

[zygomidus]

@Duta-M no you because you make the food foreign to the body by altering the chemical structure of the food when you cook it. Also you create toxins and damage nutrients when you cook it.

[requisit]

@Brody-Moore I would only cook like toxic reptiles. A cow that was fed grains can still be a relativity healthy cow if an optimal environment.

[requisit]

@zygomidus Just dont eat the low quality food in the first place.

[kas d]

@88 resident rawcell aajonus never said that lmao

[zygomidus]

@XqurZz agree

[mei]

@Brody-Moore no. cooking makes it worse either way. always raw.