How Doctors Test Salmonella (HIGH IQ)
-
nice post
-
''Dad who was that post''
-
Generational post. Thank you hunterskull
-
When ur home alone the fridge is full and @hunterskull drops one of thoseee
-
How Doctors Make False Conclusions On The Effect Of "Muh bad pathogenic bacteria"
Isn't that a place in Italy?
I will explain how doctors spread false information about salmonella.
Introduction
-
We as primals know how false doctors can be, especially on the topic of raw animal foods.
-
There has been warned about the mainstream doctors: "What doctors tell you, do the opposite 99% of the time and it will work."
-
We see with the primals here that their health has been improved by doing that (consuming the right foods, rejecting pharmaceutical drugs etc.)
-
They also conclude false things in tests, like with "pathogenic bacteria", what I will show in this thread.
Louis Pasteur
-
Louis Pasteur got famous for making a theory with the false hypothesis that germs, microbes from the outside cause disease, which doctors now suddenly blindly follow.
-
He is a plagiarist, that stole his work from Antoine Béchamp. He had 102 laboratory notebooks that were examined and it showed that he falsely applied his data and his methods. He had several notebooks that show that he was a fraud and that he misled the public into thinking his experiments were more successful than they actually were.
-
Germ theory treats nature as the enemy. It justifies vaccines, pasteurization, constant chemical warfare against microbes etc. It will ignore the true cause of disease, that it is caused by a toxic environment in the body.
-
There are multiple reports that Louis Pasteur injected farmed cows with vaccines and therefore killing them, without any of the farmers approval.
-
On his deathbed, he switched his thinking towards the Terrain Theory, which states that disease comes from toxicity in the body.
How Doctors Test The Bacteria
Salmonella is the best example.
-
First they have to blindly follow the theory of a lying plagiarist to confirm that their hypothesis that salmonella causes disease has a chance of being true.
-
They put human/animal cells in a petri dish with certain agar solutions.
-
They will observe those cells dead, because the cells cannot live outside an animal. An animal cell cannot live inside a petri dish in some solution that has nothing to do with body chemistry.
-
When they introduce salmonella, they observe it eating those dead cells. The salmonella gets rid of the dead and cancerous cells.
-
Their result is that salmonella eats dead and cancerous cells.
-
Now they will falsely conclude that salmonella kills live cells and say they will cause disease.
-
They then spread that false info to the public to, ofcourse, get money that they do not deserve to earn.
Be aware of these scammers!
What Salmonella Actually Does
Salmonella is a beneficial bacteria. We all have it in our bodies.
-
It cleans up dead, damaged and cancerous cells. Without that, dead skin will accumulate and damaged tissue stays.
-
It reduces heavy metal toxicity in our bodies.
-
It helps with breaking down food, so food byproducts will become bioavailable nutrients.
-
It is used in experiments to dissolve tumors, which is also used on human bodies.
-
Symptoms labeled “salmonellosis” are detoxification responses when salmonella encounters toxicity.
So don't listen to their lies, enjoy the salmonella!
@Hunterskull Wait, you're telling me that mainstream science treats Salmonella as a fixed pathogen while ignoring the organism-environment system within which the bacterial encounter occurs???
All jokes aside, there could be genuine risks from "Salmonella". To start, have you ever asked yourself why modern industrial animal food production generates Salmonella loads that are essentially impossible in natural food contexts? If you look at any study regarding mainstream agricultural microbiology, you'll see that industrial farming conditions elevate the risk of pathogenic bacterial contamination.
Industrial factory farming directly creates conditions that are the opposite of the organism-environment conditions within which the animal's system maintains its health and microbial integrity throughout the evolutionary timeline.
Observing these animals in their clearly unnatural state - whether that be the crowding, chronic stress, antibiotic exposure, artificial feed or unnatural environment - gives a good overview of the conditions that could compromise the gut ecosystem of these animals. Now, my claim isn't that the Salmonella risk associated with raw animal foods is a property of raw animal food as a category, but rather that it is a property of the industrial production system that has compromised the microbial integrity of the animal's organism-environment system.
And so if you're one of these mfs who still gets their raw meat from the supermarket (granted you are buying low-quality meat), please reconsider. You're actively consuming raw animal foods from animals whose microbial contamination profiles are radically different from those of animals from an ancestral environment.Perception is a process, not an outcome.
-
-
@Hunterskull Wait, you're telling me that mainstream science treats Salmonella as a fixed pathogen while ignoring the organism-environment system within which the bacterial encounter occurs???
All jokes aside, there could be genuine risks from "Salmonella". To start, have you ever asked yourself why modern industrial animal food production generates Salmonella loads that are essentially impossible in natural food contexts? If you look at any study regarding mainstream agricultural microbiology, you'll see that industrial farming conditions elevate the risk of pathogenic bacterial contamination.
Industrial factory farming directly creates conditions that are the opposite of the organism-environment conditions within which the animal's system maintains its health and microbial integrity throughout the evolutionary timeline.
Observing these animals in their clearly unnatural state - whether that be the crowding, chronic stress, antibiotic exposure, artificial feed or unnatural environment - gives a good overview of the conditions that could compromise the gut ecosystem of these animals. Now, my claim isn't that the Salmonella risk associated with raw animal foods is a property of raw animal food as a category, but rather that it is a property of the industrial production system that has compromised the microbial integrity of the animal's organism-environment system.
And so if you're one of these mfs who still gets their raw meat from the supermarket (granted you are buying low-quality meat), please reconsider. You're actively consuming raw animal foods from animals whose microbial contamination profiles are radically different from those of animals from an ancestral environment. -
great post @hunterskull
-
Thank you all for the upvotes and kind messages!
You can see this post and similar posts by looking at top upvoted posts and posts with the guide tag.
"Doctors" don't know anything about nutrition and diet. Don't listen to them. Enjoy consuming raw!!!
-
Thank you all for the upvotes and kind messages!
You can see this post and similar posts by looking at top upvoted posts and posts with the guide tag.
-
@Hunterskull Me talm bout the upvotes worked🥺
Could be
️
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login